Rapid Validity Testing at the Front End of Innovation

Digital Machines, Space, and Time

Rapid Validity Testing at the Front End of Innovation

Birgit Peña Häufler, Dietfried Globocnik, Paola Landaeta Saldías, and Søren Salomo

kHUB post date: June 10, 2022
Originally published: May 29, 2021 (PDMA JPIM • Vol 38, Issue 4 • July 2021)
Read time: 50 minutes

Access the Full Article

To efficiently and effectively reduce the uncertainty inherent in the front-end of innovation processes, recent literature emphasizes new approaches that facilitate rapid knowledge generation and learning such as design thinking, lean innovation, and pretotyping. However, these approaches differ in their conceptualizations and, despite their popularity, the empirical evidence on the performance relevance of such approaches for established organizations is limited. In this research, we propose rapid validity testing (RVT), in which we conceptualize and harmonize existing approaches toward a unique and comprehensive set of front-end activities necessary to reduce uncertainty and equivocality inherent to this phase and enable planned flexibility. Drawing on information processing theory, we argue that organizations implementing RVT also increase the probability of achieving innovation outcomes of superior quality on time and within budget. We further argue that the effectiveness of RVT depends upon internal and external environmental factors. Drawing on multirespondent data collected from 1022 informants in 129 firms, we find empirical evidence that organizations implementing the RVT approach in their innovation activities achieve higher performance of their innovation programs, and that the performance relevance of RVT depends upon technological turbulence and the organization's long-term orientation and risk propensity. We contribute to the literature by conceptualizing RVT as a set of activities that enable planned flexibility. Furthermore, we overcome empirical shortcomings of studies on popular approaches that relied primarily on anecdotal or case study evidence and imply the generalizability of their effectiveness. Our findings highlight that organizations indeed not only benefit from RVT but also challenge the notion of a one-size-fits-all approach to the front end of innovation.

Practitioner Points

  • The rapid validity testing (RVT) concept proposes an approach to the front end of innovation based on the premise of planned flexibility, or the balance of anticipation and reaction capabilities, to address the fuzziness inherent to this phase of innovation processes.
  • We provide a set of activities that go beyond what is proposed by popular approaches, such as design thinking or lean innovation, and empirical evidence on their effectiveness to facilitate innovation projects to meet goals on time and within budget.
  • To achieve superior outcomes, the RVT approach emphasizes the relevance of problem framing, prototyping for testing and communication, user integration, product, and business model iterations; in addition, it stresses the relevance to integrate commercial learning, that is, feasibility and economic considerations, in this early stage, which is not an integral part of prior approaches and prevents overstressing customer needs solution fit at the cost of technical, economic, and commercial aspects.

What did you think of this post?

Start a conversation with your peers by posting to our kHUB Discussion board! Browse trending posts and reply to other thought leaders OR start your own discussion by clicking "Post New Message."

Start a Discussion

If you don't have an account with us, create a guest account or become a member today and receive exclusive access to all PDMA member benefits. Please note that both members and non-members are welcome to participate in the kHUB.