Industrial product development with lead users as a source of Schumpeterian opportunity

Capturing product/service improvement ideas from social media based on lead user theory

Industrial product development with lead users as a source of Schumpeterian opportunity

Jeroen P. J. de JongMax MulhuijzenKatrin MerfeldCoen RigteringTimo van BalenMathias Boënne

kHUB post date: November 2024
Originally published: April 10, 2024 (PDMA JPIM • Vol 41, Issue 6 • November 2024)
Read time: 50 minutes

Access the Full Article

In industrial product development with customers, it is well-known that lead userness is associated with novel and commercially attractive products. We take a next step by analyzing if lead userness is related to product development that potentially affects industry-level practices. Our main hypothesis is that lead userness results in the pursuit of Schumpeterian product opportunities: disequilibrating, radical, rare, and based on new knowledge and creative activities. In contrast, at low lead userness, more Kirznerian product opportunities are expected—which maintain industry standards. The hypothesis is supported by data from 139 high-tech small firms. Next, we anticipate that factors related to the selection of lead users, and the effective processing of their inputs, moderate the connection between lead userness and Schumpeterian opportunity. As for selection, we find a stronger connection when firms collaborate with “new” customers. Conversely, when involved customers have been business partners already for a long time, the pursuit of Schumpeterian opportunities is mitigated. Also, tentative evidence is found that the connection between lead userness and Schumpeterian opportunity amplifies when involved customers are less dominant market players. Finally, when it comes to processing lead users' input, we report tentative evidence that firms' R&D intensity should be higher (indicating ability to process lead users' inputs and make continued development efforts). Our findings help to explain why lead users have been associated with industry dynamics, and provide guidance to identify “relevant” lead users when firms seek product opportunities that potentially disequilibrate their industry.

Practitioner Points

  • When industrial firms are eager to develop new products that potentially cause industry upheaval, they may collaborate with customers with high lead userness.
  • Industrial products emerging from collaborations with lead users are more Schumpeterian: disequilibrating, radical, rare, and based on new knowledge and creative activities.
  • For firms interested in pursuing Schumpeterian opportunities, to select the “right” lead users the focus should be on new customers, and not customers they already served for a long time. Also, we find tentative evidence that involved customers should have low market dominance.
  • To effectively process lead users' inputs, industrial firms need at least average R&D intensity.

What did you think of this post?

Start a conversation with your peers by posting to our kHUB Discussion board! Browse trending posts and reply to other thought leaders OR start your own discussion by clicking "Post New Message."

Start a Discussion

If you don't have an account with us, create a guest account or become a member today and receive exclusive access to all PDMA member benefits. Please note that both members and non-members are welcome to participate in the kHUB.