An Empirical Study of AI Financial Advisor Adoption Through Technology Vulnerabilities in the Financial Context
Zi Wang, Ruizhi Yuan, Boying Li, V. Kumar, Ajay Kumar
kHUB post date: January 2026
Originally published: June 27, 2025 (PDMA JPIM • Vol 43, Issue 1 • January 2026)
Read time: 60 minutes
Access the Full Article
Financial institutions are increasingly employing artificial intelligence (AI) solutions to optimize their financial advice and services for consumers. However, consumers have demonstrated reluctance toward adopting AI technology goods, and the intermediary psychological mechanism of adoption intention in the financial service context is unclear. Using the theoretical lens of technology affordances and constraints, this article proposes the concept of consumer technology vulnerability (CTV) as the mediating mechanism in the affordance–adoption process of AI financial advisors (AFAs). Meanwhile, consumer innovativeness and self-efficacy are investigated as individual traits that moderate perceptions and psychological impacts of AI affordances. Specifically, the study first conceptualizes AI affordances in a product innovation context by reviewing the burgeoning literature on AI to date. This is followed by a US-based survey (N = 616), which shows the positive indirect effects of information optimization, customizability, and human-likeness on AFA adoption intention through CTV. Self-efficacy and consumer innovativeness are found to enhance the positive effects of AI affordances on AFA adoption intention through CTV but diminish the impact of human-likeness on CTV. These findings highlight, for the first time, the mediating role of CTV in new technology adoption. This will help technology innovators and financial institutions to identify how consumers perceive and adopt different AI affordances, and therefore to better incorporate AI characteristics into financial product innovations.
Practitioner Points
- AFA companies should create more personalized solutions catering to individual user preferences and circumstances.
- Financial firms should advocate fairness, avoid unwanted impacts of technology, and promote the equitable sharing of benefits and cultivation of solidarity, which will ultimately strengthen social cohesion.
- Financial service providers should focus more on accountability, specifically by highlighting how their products and offerings could enhance users' capability and autonomy in making their own financial decisions.