The Effects of University–Industry Collaboration in Preclinical Research on Pharmaceutical Firms’ R&

The Digital Transformation of Search and Recombination in the Innovation Function

The Effects of University–Industry Collaboration in Preclinical Research on Pharmaceutical Firms’ R&D Performance: Absorptive Capacity’s Role

Tetyana Melnychuk, Carsten Schultz

kHUB post date: March 3, 2022
Originally published: May 7, 2021 (PDMA JPIM • Vol 38 • Issue 3 • May 2021)
Read time: 45 minutes

Access the Full Article

Pharmaceutical firms frequently engage in preclinical research collaboration with universities. Many of these collaborative preclinical research projects are conducted by firms’ subsidiaries. In this setting, the challenge of transferring knowledge from university–industry collaborations (UICs) to internal research and development (R&D) increases, since knowledge has to be transferred twice: to the subsidiary and to the parent. To benefit from tacit and complex knowledge obtained through collaboration with academic partners, firms need to have a high absorptive capacity. However, existing research on absorptive capacity's effect on the efficacy of UIC has provided mixed results, and the knowledge transfer mechanisms remain unclear, particularly in the case of basic (or preclinical) research and of the complex knowledge transfer process from subsidiaries’ collaborative efforts. Building on the knowledge-based view and following a multidimensional perspective of absorptive capacity, this study investigates the role a firm's capabilities play in successful university knowledge integration in a firm's internal R&D. Therefore, this paper analyzes both parent firms’ UICs and their subsidiaries’ UICs in basic (preclinical) research. The results of our longitudinal analysis of a unique panel data set of 56 global pharmaceutical firms indicate that firms do successfully exploit valuable knowledge from preclinical research UIC in internal R&D, measured by the number of performed clinical trials. This holds true for the UIC involving the parent firm and its subsidiaries. As transformative learning dimensions of absorptive capacity, high diversity in therapeutic activity and high R&D intensity levels strengthen the positive relationship between parents’ UIC and R&D performance. A high exploration intensity level of the firm and high diversity in therapeutic activity help to transfer the knowledge from subsidiaries’ preclinical research UIC to parents’ innovation projects.

Practitioner Points

  • High university–industry collaboration (UIC) frequency in basic (preclinical) research increases firms’ R&D performance measured as the number of clinical trials phase 1.
  • A complex knowledge transfer process from UIC of subsidiaries requires high managerial attention since the success of such knowledge transfer largely depends on parent firms’ absorptive capacity.
  • High diversity in therapeutic activity and high R&D intensity as transformative learning absorptive capacity dimensions foster parent firms’ UIC knowledge integration in firms’ R&D outcome.
  • High levels of exploration intensity and diversity in therapeutic activity as exploratory and transformative learning absorptive capacity dimensions efficiently facilitate knowledge transfer from subsidiaries’ preclinical research UIC to parents’ innovation projects.

What did you think of this post?

Start a conversation with your peers by posting to our kHUB Discussion board! Browse trending posts and reply to other thought leaders OR start your own discussion by clicking "Post New Message."

Start a Discussion

If you don't have an account with us, create a guest account or become a member today and receive exclusive access to all PDMA member benefits. Please note that both members and non-members are welcome to participate in the kHUB.